Straight talking on business, brands, technology and employee engagement.

Blog Home - View all articles

An Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year 2010 and CEO of technology company Asperity Employee Benefits - Number 2 in the 2011 Sunday Times Tech Track, Glenn Elliott shares his thoughts and advice on starting a business, building a team and culture, focussing on clients and keeping investors happy.

After 14 years, 2 successful startups (plus a few failures "that didn't count"), an acquisition from a big bank and a £25m acquisition for his own business, Glenn's got experience and battle scars to share.

Running a business that services over 700 clients globally including many household names, he's built a business with an amazing culture (two stars Sunday Times Best Small Companies) and an amazing team of happy people servicing happy clients

Featured Articles



Topics.

 Subscribe in a reader or view this blog in Zimbio


Search

More information

Twitter feed

You can find more information on these sites

Posts I like

More liked posts

Tag Results

3 posts tagged Growing business

You still think Cloud Computing is scary? Seriously?

Sometimes it hits me how quickly we move and I forget how other people move much more slowly.

I was visiting another business last week where I suggested (as an aside - I wasn’t there in an official capacity or selling or anything) that they use Google Apps for business and everyone suddenly looked extremely worried. “Our IT Manager thinks Cloud Computing is a fad - he likes knowing where the data is and thinks it’s more secure where he can see it”. Seriously guys?

Cloud Computing - in other words, having your applications and data hosted elsewhere on the internet by specialists, and you just rent or pay for the service on a monthly basis - is not the future. It’s the now. And it has been for years already.

In my previous business, a design agency of 25 people, we had a full time IT manager and 11 servers - email servers, Blackberry servers (remember Blackberry!), file servers and even a font server (designers insisted on them then although I could never quite get what they did). Thousands of pounds of equipment, much more on software and constant headaches.

Now at Asperity we support 150+ users in three continents with just two IT staff and a couple of Mac Minis as departmental file servers. Everything we do and use is in the Cloud. Sure, security is critical - of course it is. There’s nothing more important and you need to obsess about it. But because the tech drudge is outsourced you can have your IT staff obsess about IT Security - they’ve actually got the time to do it justice.

There are some ridiculous comments made by laggard IT managers trying to keep control of their empire. “What happens if Google goes down?” they say. But when do you last remember a significant and long term outage at Google? And compare that to when your local IT last fell over. No-one is immune to IT cock-ups and failures, but tech is a volume game and I’d much rather I had a tiny slice of service from a massive trusted partner with hundreds of support staff, rather than owning my own servers and system.

If you’re not computing in the Cloud now, watch out. Your new competitors are going to be more nimble, faster, lower cost and more responsive. They’re going to whip you on technology - just ask Asperity’s older competitors if you need the evidence.

Not sure what Cloud Computing is? Watch this video from CommonCraft and you’ll know in 3 minutes.

Two things about scaling a business. 1. Don’t lose focus, 2. Keep things simple.

Last week I stumbled upon an article called “Two Things” which I think was originally blogged about by Glen Whitman, an Economics professor at California State University Northridge in 2004. It got re-posted quite a bit back then but, internet being what it is, times have moved on and quite a few of the original blog posts have been lost.

Anyway, it really got me thinking, so I’m keen to share it with you and expand upon it a little.

The Story of Two Things by Glen Whitman

A few years ago, I was chatting with a stranger in a bar. When I told him I was an economist, he said, “Ah. So… what are the Two Things about economics?”

“Huh?” I cleverly replied.

“You know, the Two Things. For every subject, there are really only two things you really need to know. Everything else is the application of those two things, or just not important.”

“Oh,” I said. “Okay, here are the Two Things about economics. One: Incentives matter. Two: There’s no such thing as a free lunch.”

The Two Things game is simple

It just suggests that for every profession there are only two things that really matter. Everything else is either a function of or product of those two things or isn’t really that important.

I’ve become interested in the Two Things game - not just how you apply it to professions, but how you could also apply it to other things in business - processes, projects even meetings. Imagine if every meeting you went into you agreed with your colleagues (or just yourself) what the Two Things are that you want to come out of it with. Could it make you more effective in getting what you need?

Last week I was sitting with Tracy Mellor, our Group People Director as she finished a revised job description for our UK Head of Corporate Sales job that she is currently recruiting.

It’s too long”, I complained about the 2 page job description that she has written. “But everything on it is important”, she said, followed by “we need to get better at making it clearer all the things a job involves”. So we played about with the words in a few places and combined a few bullet points where, on reflection they were really saying the same thing. We made it a few lines shorter.

It’s still too long”, I said. I was worried that people would read it and remember nothing, rather than everything - I have a very young workforce (or “Gen Y” if you’re in Australia) so we’re talking YouTube generation , attention span of a gnat etc (no offence team, we’re just being honest here).

I said, “How about we add the Two Things to the end of the JD, just to sum up what’s really important.” So we added a last section :

Two Things about Head of Corporate Sales

  • Grow our sales team by recruiting the right people
  • Hit your sales targets by coaching and training your staff to be their very best

Which just sums it up - if the person in this role gets those two things right, then everything else in their JD will either be done as consequence of that, or will pale into insignificance. If they achieve those to things but other bits of detail fail - I’ll forgive them for that, those two things are the most important - they keys to success in that job.

Spurred on by this, I quickly rattled off a few more:

Two Things about Head of Development

  1. Keep the system running and doing what the business needs
  2. Protect our data from loss and theft

Two Things about Head of Asperity 360 (Our dedicated unit servicing clients of up to 500 staff)

  1. Hit your sales targets
  2. Retain your clients on renewal

Two Things about Head of Operations (call centre, voucher and card despatch etc)

  1. Make our customers happy
  2. Hit your SLA’s and budgets

One of the things I have to do in my job at Asperity is to try keep the wheels turning as easy and freely now we’re heading towards 200 employees as they were when we had 20. When you have 20 people in a room, things are easy - you all talk and see each other every day. 200 people across 6 offices on 3 continents requires more effort. It’s not impossible, I’m certain of that, but it does require consciously searching for oil for the wheels. Could the Two Things game be part of that oil?

The great thing about Two Things is that it leads naturally to focus. Once you’ve agreed the Two Things for a particular job, project, task or meeting then you can evaluate every task or suggest against them and see how much that task or suggestion supports the TwoThings, dropping what isn’t really important.

I was lucky enough to be introduced to Larry Billet a while back who is Chairman of the sandwich chain Pret a Manger. He gave me lots of helpful advice and advised me to “look for where you can move the needle”. Many other people have given their own words suggesting focus and looking for where the value really is. Maybe the Two Things about why good businesses lose track are “complexity increases, focus is lost”?

So I don’t know where this will end. Maybe you’ll start seeing Two Things on the back of Asperity staff business cards, maybe we’ll start asking ourselves where we can apply Two Things to other things, such as “Two Things about the meeting this afternoon” or “Two things about this project”.

Maybe you could try the Two Things game today and see if it helps - whatever happens, let me know through the Comments link below and/or tweet then at #twothings. But remember :

Two Things about the Two Things game :

  1. People love to play the Two Things game, but they rarely agree about what the Two Things are.
  2. That goes double for anyone who works with computers.

Have fun,

G

There’s lots of advice around, but whose should you follow?

One of the hardest things to learn when you’re making decisions is when to follow advice and when to ignore it.

It’s even more difficult when you’re meeting lots of brilliant successful people; there’s so much wisdom and experience flying around that you feel you ought to listen to everyone. But just because you respect some one for having a great business career doesn’t mean you have to listen to everything they say

A couple of years ago, when Asperity were thinking about introducing an employee share scheme, a well-respected mentor of mine advised me that it was a really bad idea in his experience. He was quite unequivocal in cautioning me against it, believing that it was loads of work for not much return. Not only that but allocating a huge chunk of the business costs a lot of money, and his feeling was that his staff just didn’t value it at all.

In retrospect, I know it’s because so much time goes in to the legal side of setting an employee share scheme up that communicating the value to employees is almost an afterthought. Everyone gets briefed, the documents get signed and then it’s so much of a relief that the hard part’s over that it can just get forgotten about. 

What you end up with is staff that have got a vague idea that they’ve got some shares in the company, but can’t see the share prices on the stock market so have got no idea what those shares are really worth. 

I thought, if I can convey the real, tangible value of these shares to our staff, then it will be a worthwhile investment in terms of time and money. But we’re going to have to work really hard to do that. 

Against all advice, from my mentors, financial advisors, the works - it was made very clear that it was a bad idea to publish an indicative share price. I’d planned to update all our employees on what we thought their shares might be worth at every Quarterly Business Update, based on our business model and predictions. The consensus seemed to be that I must be mad - to unveil profit numbers when our predictions could be wrong would be a complete disaster.

I thought, hang on a minute - what’s actually important in all this? If your staff don’t believe in the value of what you’ve given them then you might as well not have given them anything at all. We wanted our staff to understand that the piece of paper could turn into a tangible reward. One reason to do it was to connect them to the business, to make sure they work that extra bit harder and go the extra mile.

So we took all of our staff off-site to a hotel just outside London, and we announced the introduction of the employee share program. We told them that at some point over the next three years we were hoping to find an investor to buy part of the company and that they would receive money for their shares. We made it clear that this was something to be excited about, not concerned. We went through what it would be like to be bought by a trader, what it would be like to be bought by private equity, and made sure every department knew what they had to do to contribute to make that valuation high.

And it worked. Everyone understood it. No one panicked, no one went running. And as it turned out, we didn’t sell two years later for seven times the current share valuation, we sold six months later for something like fifteen or sixteen times that amount. Subsequently, we shared just over a million pounds between our employees and only three people left the company in the following year out of a hundred staff. So overall - it worked out a lot better for the business that I didn’t listen to any advice.

I’ve come to the realisation that advice can be really helpful, but it’s just a product of one person’s experience. If it didn’t quite work out for one person, it doesn’t mean it never will. You’ve got to look at the facts and make your own decision for what’s right for the business, on your terms. Ultimately, if you ask lots of questions and find out what went wrong, you can think - how can I do it better? And if you get it wrong, don’t worry just be honest and fix it.

Loading posts...