Straight talking on business, brands, technology and employee engagement.

Blog Home - View all articles

An Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year 2010 and CEO of technology company Asperity Employee Benefits - Number 2 in the 2011 Sunday Times Tech Track, Glenn Elliott shares his thoughts and advice on starting a business, building a team and culture, focussing on clients and keeping investors happy.

After 14 years, 2 successful startups (plus a few failures "that didn't count"), an acquisition from a big bank and a £25m acquisition for his own business, Glenn's got experience and battle scars to share.

Running a business that services over 700 clients globally including many household names, he's built a business with an amazing culture (two stars Sunday Times Best Small Companies) and an amazing team of happy people servicing happy clients

Featured Articles



Topics.

 Subscribe in a reader or view this blog in Zimbio


Search

More information

Twitter feed

You can find more information on these sites

Posts I like

More liked posts

Tag Results

6 posts tagged Business Advice

My 101 on a leveraged buyout. Why they are essential and occasionally dangerous.

At Asperity, we have a monthly Lunchtime Learning session. 100-odd Asperity staffers in a room, bring your own lunch for a (hopefully interesting) talk about business. This Thursday, I’m doing the story of Asperity’s £25.5m sale to Inflexion Private equity. It’s called “Red Wine, Fancy Dinners & 680 signatures”. I wish it was as easy as that title suggests!

So with this very much on my mind, I thought I’d use my blog this week to establish some key concepts that will help everyone understand private equity. Probably the most important thing to understand is leverage, so here goes….

The leveraged buy out. As simple as I can do it!

Almost all deals done by private equity and venture capitalists (VC’s) are Levereged Buy Outs - so what does it mean and is it important?

Well a leveraged buy out is simply where you borrow money to buy something - a bit like buying a house or car. The loan is the leverage. And the loan is secured on the thing that you buy - the house or the company or the car. So if the loan isn’t paid back then the bank ends up owning the house, company or car.

A leveraged buy out is quite like a house mortgage. The difference just comes in the scale.

Valuation is key

When you buy a house, you have it independently valued and a professional valuer takes a sensible and cautious look at what the house is really worth. They look at other houses in the area, general trends in the local housing market and what the condition of the house is and then they settle on a sensible price. Then the bank lends you part of that money. So if your house is worth $250,000 the bank may lend you 90% of that, or $225,000 and you have to pay the rest in a deposit. This means if you don’t keep up the repayments the bank is pretty comfortable that they can get their money back on the house as the loan is for a maximum of $225,000 and the house at a sensible valuation is worth more than that. So far so good.

The bank also looks at your ability to repay the loan, and looks at your earnings to make sure you have enough money to pay the mortgage each month. Of course your circumstances may change - you or a partner may lose their job or work less hours and therefore earn less money. Or you may get into debt elsewhere and have less spare income so things can change. And all of this also happens in a levereged buy out. So lets map this onto a business.

Buying a business through a Leveraged Buy Out

Imagine you wanted to buy a business that is making £1 million profit each year. You might agree that you’ll pay the owner £7 million for it - which is 7 times the last year’s profits. A reasonable valuation for a growing business.

You could pay the whole £7 million yourself, but that might use up all of your cash. So instead, you go to the bank and ask if they would lend money on that business. You spend time showcasing the business to the bank, answering all of their questions and giving them all of the information on which they can evaluate the business - hopefully to see that it is a sound business with good prospects that is a good bet to lend money to.

In the end the bank agrees to lend £3 million, which you can now use as part of your £7 million to buy the business - so you only need £4 million of your own money.

You do all of this primarily because you believe that you can borrow money from the bank for a lower interest rate than your money is worth to you. So in our example above, rather than using £7m of your own money, you used £4m, leaving £3m of your money for other things. You’ll be paying interest on the £3m to the bank, but as long as the interest rate is lower than the return you think you can get on your £3m if you invested it elsewhere then you’re happy!

Who’s borrowing the money?

A Leveraged Buy Out is organised so the person doing the borrowing is actually the company being bought, not the buyer. It took me a little time to get my head around this at first, I have to be honest. I thought it was odd that the buyer didn’t borrow the money. It seemed odd that the company would borrow the money to then give it to the buyer who would then use it to buy the company. But then I realised that the buyer will own the company anyway, so it’s not that different really.

Think about it. If you want to buy the local dry cleaners for £250,000 and the dry cleaners is generating enough reliable profits for a bank to happily lend it £100,000, then you get the dry cleaning business to borrow that money at the exact same time that you buy the dry cleaners from its previous owners (the shareholders) for £250,000.

Then, when you write the check to the previous owners, you only need to write a cheque for £150,000 as the bank provides the other £100,000. And you now own a dry cleaners that has £100,000 of debt in it on day 1. This debt is called “senior debt” - because the company agrees to pay it back first, before any other loans it may have accumulated along the way. That’s one of the ways that banks try to improve their chances of getting their money back.

Now, think about liability

The good thing for you, as the buyer, is that if things go wrong the liability for the loan is with the company not with you. So in our example above it’s with the dry cleaning business rather than with you personally. So if the business falls on hard times and can’t make the loan repayments then the debt, the problems are between the bank and the business.

The bank can’t come chasing you for the money, because they lent it to the business. So if it really all goes wrong, the bank ends up foreclosing and owning the business. Quite a few large businesses that we all know are effectively owned by their banks right now.

To much leverage can make things go wrong.

One of the difficulties with leveraged buy outs is that businesses are harder to value than houses. House prices, despite recent troubles, are actually very stable over the long term. Unless the local area suddenly takes a real turn for the worst it’s very unusual for a house price to suddenly fall.

But even good businesses can be more fragile. A change to market conditions, fashion, consumer behavior, environment, competitors, or even just bad management can all change a company’s fortunes quite quickly.

If a bank has agreed to lend the company a lot of money compared to its profits, then a relatively small change in the company’s fortunes can make it unable to make it’s loan repayments. This happens more times than everyone would like and there are some high profile cases of this recently. The most newsworthy ones are often in retail.

Before a company becomes unable to make it’s loan repayments, it will normally “break it’s covenants”. You’ll have heard that term in the business press and tomorrow on my blog, we’ll talk about what covenants are and why they are important.

Complexity hits you in 4 places. It is an evil that constrains profits and holds back growth.

Your business is under threat. Not just from competition, but from somewhere you may not have thought of - from complexity. All businesses are threatened by complexity and it is an evil that is worse than your most effective competitor.

Unless managed and driven out, complexity creeps up and overcomes you. You’re lean and nimble one day and sluggish and unresponsive the next. We have a constant war on complexity at Asperity and it’s one of the reasons we’ve been able to grow so quickly and so smoothly.

Asperity has grown steadily at around 50 clients per quarter for the last three and a half years. Some people think thats a rapid growth level, we occasionally get asked how we cope - we just think its normal. But “normal” fast growth means we now have 150 staff across seven offices in 5 countries. We have 750+ clients using 8 different products. 2 million users with, it seems sometimes, as many different sets of desires and needs.

Complexity increases with time, unless you manage it down. A natural by-product of work seems to be complexity. I’ve seen businesses get complex without actually growing in size that much, complexity seems to just creep in by a factor of their age. So it requires constant work, constant vigilance to defeat complexity in every part of your business.

There are 4 places that complexity creeps up.

In an online business, complexity develops in 4 key areas. You must defend against it and defeat it in all of them. If you do, you will scale quickly and profitably. Your clients will love your smooth, slick service and your staff will be motivated, engaged and know clearly where they are going.

  1. Product
    If you’re in manufacturing, you make new products. Each product improves on the previous one or does a different job, satisfying a different niche in your marketplace. If you keep adding new products without looking at your whole range and trimming and reframing you can end up with an overly complex product line. An overly complex product line requires an overly complex supply chain and an overly complex sales and service channel.

    When you’re an online service you do occasionally start again and build a new product. But most of the time you add features and functionality to your existing platform. So rather than starting again you add. If you’re not careful, if you don’t take steps to remove things and take things away as you progress you end up with a product that looks too complex to the user.

    Designing by committee is a guaranteed way to get product complexity. If everyone  can bolt on whatever feature or idea they come up with you’re going to get product complexity. And that will turn some users off. Someone needs to be the product owner and have both strength of vision and an understanding of design restraint. They’ll also need the strength of character to get others to see their way because sometimes you need to leave off a feature that 3% of your users would like because adding too much will make your product look too complex for a different 33%.
     
  2. Technical
    As a company grows, the development team that builds your product often grows. And as each month goes by they write more code, more modules, create more subsystems. Even if someone is keeping an eye on minimising complexity of the user, the technical complexity behind the scenes can grow and get bigger and bigger.

    In software development there are some rules that never change. Everything always takes longer than you think; Version one of a piece of software is never that good; There are always bugs; Something involving a manual process will go wrong; If it should’t happen it almost certainly will so you should code for it.

    As your system grows, technical complexity increases in an upward curve. Quickly no single person knows the whole system and soon after that there are parts of the system that no-one understands. When my career at BT started I was, as a naive young programmer, amazed that not a single programmer or tester in my unit had any idea how the debt management system worked - it hadn’t been changed for years and all the knowledge had gone. When it did need changing it took us forever to unpick it and reverse engineer how it had been built.

    As technical complexity increases, bugs increase, cost of development increases, likelihood of outages increases. When considering development work you need to be ruthless in your evaluation of “do we really need it”. Ask yourself what the true lifetime cost is of the new back end system you are considering. Is it really worth it?

    At Asperity we just avoided building a new and complex rules engine just to avoid sending all of our credit transactions to a third party for anti-fraud verification. The rules engine could have saved us 30% of the external costs of this external checking - but actually when you really looked at it, adding the complexity of another rules engine to build, tweak, improve, maintain would have cost us more than the 30% we would have saved.
     
  3. Operational
    This is where your people interact with your systems and customers. Operations are the people who do, whether they run your help desk, your fulfilment operation or your clients services team.

    When designing new products and services beware of introducing unnecessary operational complexity. A classic place for this to develop is in the gap between what an IT system does and what it should do. In so many businesses the IT misses the mark and operations fill in. You can see it when operations are dealing with manual workarounds and “fudges” to get a system to do something it wasn’t really designed to do.

    Operational complexity is a menace. It causes scaling problems because complex operations need more senior people to run them. Your staffing costs go up and they need more training and more support. People are harder to replace when off and they make more mistakes because their jobs are too complex.

    Be alert for operational complexity - look for people doing jobs that should be being done by systems. Look for them doing jobs that don’t need doing and look  for them doing jobs in a more complex or time consuming way than they should.

    A couple of years ago, at Asperity we used to sell £10 million of retail gift vouchers every month (now it’s almost all moved to plastic cards and e-vouchers). I remember noticing the laborious process or someone recording endless batch numbers in a huge spreadsheet every time they did a despatch. When I asked why they did this they said “because Finance need it”. When I went to ask Finance what they did with them they said they printed them and filed them for audit. We found out together than we actually no longer needed to do this - the files weren’t being used but none of us had realised. We stopped doing it that day and saved a whole piece of complexity.
     
  4. Organisational
    All small organisations start out lean and fit. They make decisions fast and they generally make good decisions because the people with the power are close to the coal face. They have the facts first hand and they act quickly.

    As organisations grow they inevitably need to delegate power and responsibility to groups, committees and structures. Levels of hierarchy start and people end up with narrower responsibilities. Some of this is an essential part of growing. Develoved power and team working are good things, great things even. Without them your business can’t grow and it won’t sustain a bigger market share.

    But as you grow you will add structures and hierarchies so you also need to keep a close eye on other structures and hierarchies that no longer work or you no longer need. Many structures need to be retired not because they are failures or were bad ideas, but just because they have served their purpose.

    If you don’t do this, you’ll keep adding things every year and your organisation will get more and more complex. You’ll find that decisions take too long and are poor as they are made by people who are too far from the facts. You’ll find staff getting disengaged as they are frustrated by what they see as pointless bureaucracy. You’ll find your people making only half an effort as they don’t quite know which way the company is going - they can’t go the extra mile because they don’t know which direction to do the extra mile in!

    Organisational complexity is one of the hardest things to minimise because it tends to involve people, and where people exist and have power they naturally protect it. Who would want to give up their position and power if they are afraid of what will happen to them without it.

    Defeating organisational complexity requires really great managers who can spot it, who can spot structures, departments and allocations of responsibility that are not really working as well as they could. It requires managers to really want to fix it and make things right and better because its a lot of work and it is sometimes painful. 

Whatever department or organisation you work in make today the start of your renewed war on complexity. Look for processes not adding value, products not pulling their weight, features that you don’t need. Look for organisational situations that aren’t really working. Look for concentrations of power or authority where that power or authority is not effective. Look for work being done in the wrong place, where it is less effective and could be consolidated. Look for dysfunction and look for ways to improve on it. It is all of our jobs to make things better after all. 

Whether you’re in marketing, sales, product or service you must contribute to your organisations war on complexity. If you don’t, you’ll leave the door wide open for your leaner, uncomplicated competitors to steal your lunch, and all of our jobs.

Facebook paid $1bn for Instagram. That’s why you too should apply a value model to your pricing.

I’ve spent most of the last two weeks working on business training with our team in Australia and one of the things I cover is about price and value. If you’re a retailer than you’ll try to price as low as possible to get a lead on your retail competitors. But if you’re actually the producer of a product or service then it’s a classic business mistake to price your product or service based on the input costs plus a margin. It results in a number that is unrelated to the value your product or service creates for the buyer, and that value is the only thing that is really important. 

If it results in a number that is cheaper than the buyer would happily pay for your product then you run the risk of under-delivering on their expectations of quality or service levels. If it’s too expensive then no-one will buy it.

It’s really important to find out the level of value that the buyer places on your product or service and price accordingly. That way, you get to make a good margin, which is important so you can keep investing in your business and keep innovating for the future and also you get to deliver it at the right quality level so the buyer is happy. Of course your value-based price needs to be higher than the cost to you of producing the product or service, and if it isn’t then you need to go back to the drawing board and work out how to reduce your costs.

I sometimes use the example of a bunch of flowers here, just to prove a point by showing an extreme. I show a picture of two identical bunches of flowers. The bunch on the left is called “Bunch of flowers - $59.99”, the bunch on the right is called “Wedding bouquet - $139.99”. It’s an extreme example of showing the impact of the situation in the buyers apportionment of value. In the wedding example, all of the emotion and love wrapped up in the event and the day causes us to put crazy valuations on things that are not that different from something we would buy normally at a much lower price. You see this a lot in hotels and the service industry.

Facebook’s $1bn purchase of Instagram is the perfect example of this.

As I was reading my paper this morning, still full of stories of surprise at the $1bn that Facebook paid for Instagram. I realised that this is as good an example of the Value principle as ever. Let’s look at it :

Value to Facebook :  the 30 million users that Instagram have sharing photos and a great, easy to use App. These numbers will grow now that the Android version of the App is ready as well

Situation : Facebook has no real capability in this area, is years behind Instagram, but perhaps most importantly is spooked by the rapid success of Pinterest, a new social network all based around photographs. Facebook are threatened by Pinterest, whose sudden arrival on the scene has caused fear at Facebook that someone else has a trump card. Another significant piece of the situation is that Facebook is sitting on, I understand, around $4bn of cash and reserves available to itself for acquisitions, most of it raised from investors who are excited about the future. So very simply it has the cash to do a seemingly crazy deal like this

Alternatives : There are always alternatives. Facebook could build their own technology, but they’d be 18 months behind, during which time Instagram and Pinterest could surge ahead. They could buy something else, such as Hipstamatic - but thats a photo app with no social network, and Facebook likes social networks.

When you look at the value formula, Two Things really stand out :

  1. The cost of Instagram’s service, i.e. how much it cost them in investment to get to this stage is immaterial - it’s not even on the page.
  2. It’s the situation that’s most important in the formula, and the situation that Facebook is in includes fear - fear of being left behind. When emotions are involved in a price or valuation situation, valuations can go up substantially.

Having money in the bank also, of course, makes a real big difference. Cash in the bank doesn’t grow very much unless you invest it in businesses. Cash in the bank gets a very small return, but cash invested in a business earns much more (but with more risk). Facebook isn’t really investing $1bn in Instagram, they are acquiring it and will, presumably, assimilate it, it’s technology and users, eventually into Facebook itself.  So Facebook are really taking their investor’s cash, which is already in their bank account waiting for a big strategic move to make, and investing it in the future Facebook business.

Will it work? Will it really deliver them more than $1bn in value? I don’t know. But I know that many big acquisitions and mergers fail to deliver the expected value because of a clash of cultures and an inability to get the two companies to set aside their differences and work together as one. So at least that can’t happen in this one - Instagram only has a few dozen staff so it shouldn’t be that hard to get control of!

Deals like this really go to show that just like how beauty is in the eye of the beholder, value is in the eye of the purchaser. Think about the value formula in relation to your product or service. Have you made the fundamental pricing mistake of pricing using a cost+margin model?

What is culture anyway? And the 5 things I ask of all new staff.

I read an article this weekend called ‘Here’s what happens when you hate your job” by Brent Daily (read the full article on Mashable here).  He talks about getting a new job and how important a culture fit is for both the employer and the employee. Brent suggests that when evaluating a job at an interview you think about these 4 questions :

  • Decision-Making. Who makes the decisions, how are they made, who gets credit?
  • Feedback and Rewards. How and when can you be expected to get feedback? What do the top performers do to be considered such?
  • Team Dynamics. What needs fixing? What are the expectations of new team members? What’s a meeting sound like (i.e. thoughtful, raised voices)?
  • Management. Is your manager a top performer or is your star going to dim simply by being in his/her orbit?

That got me thinking - what is “company culture”? In Brent’s post it’s about decision making, feedback and dynamics. He’s not wrong, those things are definitely important, but how else do we describe it?

I think on aspect Culture is the set of values that binds you together as a group of people working in a strong unit . In organisations that have a strong culture, there is a strong sense of what it means to be there, of how to behave, how to decide and of what is important and what is not, of what is acceptable and what is not.

Culture is important - it’s the unwritten rule book of how to behave.

At Asperity, I still deliver our Culture & Values Induction to every single new starter - that means running the programme every 2-3 weeks in London and again whenever I’m in Sydney or New York. We use video versions of it as well if I’m in the wrong part of the world when we need to start new people.

Culture is the most important thing that we have in an organisation because it’s the unwritten rule book of how to behave. I promised my staff, and our investors that I would do everything I could to protect our culture as we grow, and I’d encourage anyone in business, whatever organisation or department you are leading to make time to nurture and re-enforce your culture. Because it does take time to nurture, especially if you’re growing quickly and adding new staff all the time.

Whilst Culture might often be an unwritten rule book, our Culture & Values induction is an attempt to write it down and communicate it, so our new starters know how we behave, and how we’d like them to behave. It’s amazing how many times people have said to me afterwards that it’s all common sense but that no-one has ever discussed culture with them before when starting a new job.

What is in Asperity’s Culture & Value’s introduction?

In our Induction, I start with a bit of company history, explain how we started, why we started and what we hoped would work. I explain that our niche (employee discounts) was in a spiral of decline back in 2006 (Poor service & technology => Low usage by employees => Low value to employers =>Providers couldn’t charge much/anything => No money to invest in product & service, then repeat spiral). I explain that my hunch was that if you provided a great service with genuine, long term deals that people could rely on then employees would use the product, employers would value that and they would be prepared to pay a fair price for that.

I explain what we stand for in the market, why we make the decisions that we do and what are the immovable pillars of our product (high engagement, high quality, innovative technology and hard working communications) and how they have made us successful.

Next, I contrast our growth and success against our competitors in our small market and show the forecasts and plans we have for the next 4 years. We’ve always believed in employee share ownership at Asperity and we have an Employee Share Scheme that puts 5% of the value of our company in the hands of our staff. That’s important to us and it’s important to me to make sure that our staff know what that means for them and how we need them to contribute so we can become the company that we want to. We need people to take ownership, take risks, innovate, deliver on promises and keep challenging - always being unsatisfied with where we are and striving for better.

So with all of the basics done - our history, where we’re going and how we need people to contribute, we’re left to talk about culture and the day to day behaviour that we expect. So without doing all of the details, I thought I’d share with you some of the key points of that section. We’re always practical and pragmatic at Asperity, so we talk about our culture in with simple words and practical examples.

Here are five things we tell and ask of all of our new staff:

You are our brand.  Your conduct and choices are the most important thing we have.

  • The way we deal with people every day - whether they are  customers, employees, clients, suppliers, partners, channels is the most important part of our brand.
  • We should always be polite, respectful, decent, honest and have integrity - even when we disagree.
  • You can be tough, single minded, focused and results driven without being mean, rude, disrespectful or discourteous.
  • We want to win, we want to grow our business. We fight hard but always fairly - we don’t need to cheat or lie.

Be nice to people whenever you can. Treat them with respect - it’s a small industry and you don’t know when you’ll meet them again

  • The recruiter who worked hard on 3 candidates for you but you didn’t hire - she might have the right one next time
  • The guy at the small supplier that you don’t really need today might work for a supplier you really need in the future.
  • The HR Manager at that tiny company giving you a hard time be worth little today, but tomorrow she may be HR Director at a major employer you want to work with

Be reliable, organised and available.

  • There’s nothing worse than promises that are broken or expectations not met
  • Phone calls not returned or delivery dates not met are the most destructive things in a business.
  • Clients and employees will forgive almost any genuine mistake as long as they know you are fixing it and you are responsive
  • Acknowledge phone calls and emails quickly. You might not be able to fully answer or deal with the issue but let them know you are working on it
  • Make sure you organise yourself to deliver - whatever that means for you.

We will get things wrong sometimes. It’s OK. Apologise more than you need to. Compensate more than you have to.

  • You can easily turn bad service or a cock up into a positive memory for the client.
  • Apologise first. Never dodge a bullet.
  • Fix it quickly. Compensate if you need to.
  • Apologise again. Check the remedy has worked and is enough. Find out what else we can do.
  • Find out how we can avoid it happening again. We must learn from our mistakes.

Deliver our brand every day

  • be clear - use straight talking, not jargon
  • be friendly - we don’t hide behind complexity or pompous concepts
  • be straightforward - we’re practical and pragmatic
  • look to the long term - we understand that relationships need give and take
  • deliver on your promises

How do these match the feel of your organisation? Do you have a similar set of rules in your organisation or business?

Ultimately, Asperity’s culture is about honesty and trust. We accept controlled failure because you have to if you want to innovate - it’s not possible to be bold and change things if you’re terrified of what will happen when something goes wrong. But that doesn’t mean that you don’t take responsibility - because that’s crucial. Responsibility is something that strong people take, blame is something that is given out when a culture is weak.

So this week, wherever you are, whether you work for me in Asperity, or for someone else in another organisation, have a think about your culture, about what you understand about it and what’s important and see what you can do to nurture and tend to your culture this week.

There’s lots of advice around, but whose should you follow?

One of the hardest things to learn when you’re making decisions is when to follow advice and when to ignore it.

It’s even more difficult when you’re meeting lots of brilliant successful people; there’s so much wisdom and experience flying around that you feel you ought to listen to everyone. But just because you respect some one for having a great business career doesn’t mean you have to listen to everything they say

A couple of years ago, when Asperity were thinking about introducing an employee share scheme, a well-respected mentor of mine advised me that it was a really bad idea in his experience. He was quite unequivocal in cautioning me against it, believing that it was loads of work for not much return. Not only that but allocating a huge chunk of the business costs a lot of money, and his feeling was that his staff just didn’t value it at all.

In retrospect, I know it’s because so much time goes in to the legal side of setting an employee share scheme up that communicating the value to employees is almost an afterthought. Everyone gets briefed, the documents get signed and then it’s so much of a relief that the hard part’s over that it can just get forgotten about. 

What you end up with is staff that have got a vague idea that they’ve got some shares in the company, but can’t see the share prices on the stock market so have got no idea what those shares are really worth. 

I thought, if I can convey the real, tangible value of these shares to our staff, then it will be a worthwhile investment in terms of time and money. But we’re going to have to work really hard to do that. 

Against all advice, from my mentors, financial advisors, the works - it was made very clear that it was a bad idea to publish an indicative share price. I’d planned to update all our employees on what we thought their shares might be worth at every Quarterly Business Update, based on our business model and predictions. The consensus seemed to be that I must be mad - to unveil profit numbers when our predictions could be wrong would be a complete disaster.

I thought, hang on a minute - what’s actually important in all this? If your staff don’t believe in the value of what you’ve given them then you might as well not have given them anything at all. We wanted our staff to understand that the piece of paper could turn into a tangible reward. One reason to do it was to connect them to the business, to make sure they work that extra bit harder and go the extra mile.

So we took all of our staff off-site to a hotel just outside London, and we announced the introduction of the employee share program. We told them that at some point over the next three years we were hoping to find an investor to buy part of the company and that they would receive money for their shares. We made it clear that this was something to be excited about, not concerned. We went through what it would be like to be bought by a trader, what it would be like to be bought by private equity, and made sure every department knew what they had to do to contribute to make that valuation high.

And it worked. Everyone understood it. No one panicked, no one went running. And as it turned out, we didn’t sell two years later for seven times the current share valuation, we sold six months later for something like fifteen or sixteen times that amount. Subsequently, we shared just over a million pounds between our employees and only three people left the company in the following year out of a hundred staff. So overall - it worked out a lot better for the business that I didn’t listen to any advice.

I’ve come to the realisation that advice can be really helpful, but it’s just a product of one person’s experience. If it didn’t quite work out for one person, it doesn’t mean it never will. You’ve got to look at the facts and make your own decision for what’s right for the business, on your terms. Ultimately, if you ask lots of questions and find out what went wrong, you can think - how can I do it better? And if you get it wrong, don’t worry just be honest and fix it.

Loading posts...